I don’t remember anyone I knew that had more than needed or anything that made them a slave to a possession. We had all that we needed, but not much extra. But thinking it over, we had one car, and no toys such as boats, four-wheelers and the like. I wonder how far that would go today to support a household. My Dad was one of the highest at $125 per week. A flashback reminds me of being in the third grade and talking and bragging to my friends about how much money our dad’s made. Dad went to work and farmed, and he was the only source of income. My grandmother lived next door to us, and I remember staying there in the summer occasionally, but for the most part we were with mom. We had three channels we watched from a black and white TV set, and it was free. We didn’t have 150-plus channels and pay per views or a $125 or so cable or satellite bill to pay. Like the joke says, if the president had an ,we were screwed as it was broadcast over all the channels. ![]() It was always the kids’ job to change it to one of the other two channels. ![]() The fourth channel came when I was a young teenager when we got WXIX out of Cincinnati and the wonderful Larry Smith Puppet Show. We had three channels with only one set for the entire house. We ate around the kitchen table all together most every night. There weren’t a lot of times spent eating out either. There were no traveling teams or activities that kept us away from home. The only rule was when it got dark, we had better be home. Yes, it was a much safer time for kids as we left in the morning. Best I remember, other than that, my time was spent at home. In the wintertime I did Cub Scouts for a few years. I absolutely loved baseball - games twice a week and practice on Saturday. And I don’t remember having one every year up until adulthood. I was 9-10 years old, and my parents allowed me to invite a dozen or so of my friends over for a party. I still have the picture buried in a box somewhere. More of this is how it was, and we all seemed OK with it. This is not an attack as to how bad I had it. I also knew a lot of kids that seemed to live about the same. But it makes you wonder if we have all just gotten so smart that we traded intelligence for common sense.Īs I have said many times, I grew up in a very nice home and had most of whatever I needed to be happy and healthy. Who wouldn’t want that? Does anyone else but me feel that we have made our lives and our children’s lives more complex than they were ever intended to be? I sure hope this doesn’t sound like another old geezer story about how wrong the world is now. ![]() It goes without saying that there is nothing wrong with making a good thing better. For like a kiss shared between friends and lovers and even movie audiences, a good KISS is memorable, full of passion and imagination, and can ignite the world.įor more information: have all heard about using the KISS method, most commonly known as “Keep It Simple Stupid.” It’s very easy to recall when we see someone else violating this sacred rule, but I am not always sure we recognize the fact that maybe, just maybe, we are ourselves in violation often. This is almost a call to arms, a suggestion to present your message in the most effective way possible so that it can be disseminated beyond your presentation through all available channels. But It is a commodity that is becoming scarce nowadays.” This is not even open for discussion it is fact.Īs Andre Santini, a former French national politician, told us, “Journalists love little provocative phrases because they create a ‘buzz.’ Is there a recipe for creating these phrases? It takes a bit of spirit, and a bit of culture wouldn’t go amiss, either. If you do not provide a sound bite that fits into Twitter or Instagram or Snapchat or whatever else is out there, then someone using those media will do it for you, and what is sent out worldwide will not be in your control. As should be clear by now, we disagree.Īnother reason to throw a KISS to your audience is the prevalence today of social media as a means of disseminating news and messages. We find a certain resistance to simplicity among French and German audiences, for example, where the tendency is to overload a presentation with facts, figures and jargon in the belief that a clear, simple, and elegant presentation may be construed as somehow incompetent. However, cultural differences in public speaking still can stand in the way. In this way, your audience first knows what you will tell them, then understands how you reached your conclusion. This is an effective and successful method in the Anglo-Saxon world and is becoming more prevalent as English becomes the lingua-franca of the business world. We have found the most effective way to ensure simplicity and elegance in presentations is to start with the bottom line -that is, your conclusion -and then backfill. and keep it simple! (Photo credit: Shutterstock)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |